Hunter Biden's Laptop
LAPTOP is a memecoin launched by Hunter Biden on Base, the Ethereum layer 2 network developed by Coinbase, on September 9, 2026.[1] In its MiCAR-compliant white paper, the project classifies $LAPTOP as an "other crypto-asset" meme token under the EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation and describes it as a purely speculative digital collectible that does not confer ownership, governance, payment, or other rights or utility.[4] The token has a fixed total supply of one billion units administered by Phoenix Veritas Ventures Ltd and the Phoenix Veritas Foundation.[4][1] LAPTOP's launch was marked by extreme price volatility and a rapid crash that drew significant attention from mainstream media outlets and cryptocurrency industry observers.[7][8][5][6]
Compare Cryptoassets
Select an asset to compare its price and other stats against Hunter Biden's Laptop.
Background and Origin of the Name
The LAPTOP name references a physical computer that Hunter Biden left at a repair facility in Delaware in 2019.[1]
After the device was abandoned, its contents entered public circulation and became a recurring subject in American political controversy. Material said to have originated from the laptop included emails about Biden's overseas business dealings and personal photographs, messages, and videos relating to his drug use and private life. [1]
Content recovered from the device was later used as evidence presented during Biden's 2024 federal firearms conviction.[2]
Biden presented the token as an effort to take ownership of an episode that had been repeatedly used against him. In his public posts he wrote,
"They turned laptop into a weapon. I turned it into a token," and separately, "They weaponized the laptop against me. I've transformed it into a digital asset."[1][2]
He announced the coin on X on September 8, 2026, referencing a Wall Street Journal article about the launch, and stated, "LAPTOP isn't just about owning something, it's about saying something."[2][3]
Biden acknowledged skepticism about the venture directly. In an X post he wrote, "I understand the cynicism," and asked, "Why something that has been so misused by grifters?"[1]
He also cautioned prospective buyers against expecting financial gains, writing, "You should not expect me or anyone else to make this token more valuable for you," and characterizing LAPTOP as "about saying something" rather than a promise of returns.[1]
Tokenomics and Distribution
LAPTOP's one billion tokens are divided across four broad categories, with the largest portions dedicated to community airdrops, a set of prediction-linked outcomes, founder allocations, and a combined reserve for operations and charity.[1] At the token generation event, 350 million tokens, or 35% of the fixed one billion supply, were effectively unlocked across liquidity, treasury and Day-One airdrop allocations, while the remaining 65% was placed under lockups and multi-year vesting schedules.[8][7] Under the MiCA framework, Phoenix Veritas Ventures Ltd sought admission to trading for $LAPTOP on cryptocurrency exchanges serving users in the European Economic Area rather than conducting a fundraising token sale.[4]
The distribution mechanics described by the project were self-reported in its launch materials and public posts.[4]
Community Airdrops
Twenty percent of the total supply is allocated to community airdrops.[2] When the token went live, 10% of the total supply became claimable through a portal operated by the Phoenix Veritas Foundation, with the foundation slated to distribute the remaining 10% at a later date on its own timeline.[2] Day-One claimable tokens and inventory provided by market makers such as GSR, G20 and Wintermute accounted for a substantial portion of the circulating float during the first hours of trading.[7][8]
Eligibility was split into named groups. Investors who experienced losses holding Donald Trump's TRUMP memecoin were made eligible to claim 2% of the total supply, while subscribers to Biden's newsletter, titled "Where's Hunter?", were eligible to receive 8%.[2]
The project's original distribution plan also named Biden's Substack subscribers and a mailing list associated with video journalist Andrew Callaghan's Channel 5. The Channel 5 mailing list was later said to have had subscriber information removed before an email was sent.[1]
Prediction-Linked Supply
Thirty percent of the supply is tied to 30 predetermined political, crypto, and cultural outcomes, many connected to Polymarket prediction platforms.[2][1]
The mechanism operates in two directions: when a forecasted event materializes, the tokens assigned to that outcome are burned and permanently removed from circulation; when a prediction fails to come true, the corresponding tokens are transferred to charitable organizations.[2] Thirty percent of the total supply linked to this mechanism is subject to a 12‑month lock followed by a 24‑month vesting period, meaning these tokens were not available to trade during the launch-day crash.[7][9]
Example outcomes cited in the launch plan included a Democratic victory in the 2028 US presidential election, Bitcoin reaching another all-time high, and LAPTOP overtaking TRUMP's market capitalization.[1]
Founder Allocation
The founding team, which includes Hunter Biden, receives 30% of the supply.[2]
This portion is subject to a six-month lock-up followed by 24 months of gradual vesting, during which the tokens are released incrementally over more than two years.[2][1] More detailed disclosures state that the 300 million founder tokens, including Hunter Biden’s allocation, received no token release at launch, were placed with Coinbase Custody, and could not be sold during the first six months, so they were not available to sell during the launch‑day crash.[8][9] Project communications and third‑party reporting also emphasized that there was no presale and no separate investor or influencer allocations beyond the disclosed tokenomics.[9]
Reserves, Liquidity, and Charity
The final 20% of the supply is reserved for liquidity, exchange listings, legal expenses, administration, and charitable purposes.[1]
Within this, 10% of supply is dedicated to liquidity provisions and 5% is held in the foundation treasury for operational expenses.[2] The initial 35% of tokens effectively unlocked at launch consisted of this liquidity allocation, the foundation treasury and Day-One airdrop allocations, while the remaining 65% of supply remained locked or vesting under multi‑year schedules.[8][7]
A separate unconditional allocation of 50 million tokens is designated for charity independent of the prediction mechanism.[2]
Post-Launch Trading Dynamics
Within minutes of trading opening on September 9, 2026, quotes near $200 per LAPTOP briefly implied a fully diluted valuation approaching $200 billion, a figure derived by multiplying the early price by the fixed one billion-token supply rather than reflecting capital committed to the market.[7] Analytics dashboards captured a peak fully diluted valuation of about $144.96 billion supported by roughly $48,000 of liquidity, and subsequent media coverage described the near-$200 billion figure as the product of applying the early thinly traded price to the entire supply.[7] Reports from market-data aggregators and crypto news outlets recorded that the token then fell more than 90%–99% from those initial prices within about an hour and remained over 99% below its early peak by the following day.[8][9]
Individual on-chain examples illustrated the impact of this volatility. Two newly created wallets that claimed 4,276 LAPTOP each from the airdrop later realized approximately $404,000 and $243,000 in sale proceeds, respectively, while another trader withdrew around $250,000 from Binance, spent about $200,000 buying 919 LAPTOP at an average price near $218, and was subsequently left with a position worth roughly $3,000.[7] Nansen’s analysis of a small sample of wallets showed unrealized losses of $117,800 and $12,300 on two addresses and paper gains of $13,100 and $1,800 on two others, while blockchain analytics firm Bubblemaps reported that around 60% of top-holder wallets were “fresh,” funded within the 10 days before launch, many on launch day itself.[9] Trading in the first hour was split between an Aerodrome pool and a community Uniswap v4 pool on Base, with the Aerodrome Slipstream USDC pool accounting for nearly half of turnover.[7]
Criticism of the TRUMP Memecoin
Biden positioned LAPTOP in direct opposition to the TRUMP memecoin, which he attacked as a "grift."[2]
He asserted that roughly one million wallet addresses collectively lost $3.8 billion holding the token.[2]
This framing was supported by data from the analytics firm Nansen, which reported that by July 2026 approximately 988,905 wallets that had bought TRUMP were holding combined unrealized losses of $3.81 billion.[1]
The allocation of 2% of LAPTOP's supply to TRUMP holders who lost money was presented as part of this contrast, directing the airdrop toward investors Biden characterized as victims of the earlier project.[1]
Industry Response
The project encountered resistance from within the cryptocurrency industry shortly after its unveiling. The exchange Kraken deleted a promotional social media post about LAPTOP after criticism from traders, though it did not publicly state that it had abandoned any potential listing plans.[1][2]
Several parties connected to the planned distribution publicly distanced themselves. Andrew Callaghan, the video journalist whose followers were slated for an airdrop allocation, separated himself from the venture, stating that Channel 5 had nothing to do with the memecoin and that he did not consider crypto a legitimate investment.[2][1]
Jesse Pollak, the founder of Base, the Coinbase-developed blockchain hosting the token, said that Biden's project had approached Base but that the network made a "conscious decision" not to help design or promote the token, emphasizing that Base maintains no partnership arrangement with the project.[2][1]
Pollak had also stepped back from leading the Base App to concentrate on the blockchain itself.[1] Media and analytics firms widely covered the token’s launch-day crash, while some social-media users described the episode as a “rug pull”; in response, the project and Hunter Biden publicly denied that any team members had sold tokens, pointed to the documented lockups on founder and prediction allocations, and attributed the losses to thin liquidity, trading bots and speculative activity rather than insider selling.[9][8]
