Rebecca Rettig

Wiki Powered byIconIQ
Rebecca Rettig

Rebecca Rettig

Rebecca Rettig is the Chief Legal Officer at Labs. Rettig has held a series of senior legal and policy positions at other major digital asset organizations, including Labs, The Companies, and Labs, following a distinguished career in litigation at traditional law firms. [1] [2] [3]​

Education

Rettig earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in English and History from Stanford University. [4] [5] She also holds a Master of Arts in the History of International Relations from The London School of Economics and Political Science. [4] Rettig received her Juris Doctor (J.D.) from Columbia University School of Law, where she was recognized as a Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar. [1] [5] [3]

Career

Rettig began her legal career as a litigation associate at the New York-based law firm Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP. [6] During her tenure, which spanned nearly a decade, she handled a variety of complex commercial litigation matters, including financial disputes, securities cases, and antitrust law, which served as a basis for working with . [1] [7]​

Following her time at Cravath, Rettig transitioned to Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP as a partner. [1] At Manatt, she co-chaired the firm's & practice, marking her professional specialization in the legal and regulatory issues of the emerging industry. [8] [3] Prior to her career in private practice, Rettig also served as a law clerk for a federal judge. [9]​

In-House Crypto Roles

In 2020, Rettig moved into the crypto industry full-time, taking on in-house legal leadership roles at prominent protocols. She briefly served as General Counsel for Labs, a pioneering interest rate protocol, from October 2020 to May 2021. [1]​

In May 2021, Rettig became the General Counsel for The Companies, the software development group behind the Aave Protocol, one of the largest lending platforms. [1] In this capacity, she managed all legal affairs and led policy initiatives during a period of significant growth and increasing regulatory focus on the DeFi sector. [2]​

Polygon Labs

In January 2023, Rettig joined Labs as its Chief Policy Officer, a role in which she led the company's global policy and regulatory strategy. [1] [9] Her position later expanded to encompass both legal and policy functions, and she engaged with lawmakers and regulators worldwide on behalf of the scaling company until her departure in mid-2024. [2]​

Jito Labs

Rettig was appointed as the first-ever Chief Legal Officer of Labs in an announcement made around May 2024. [1] [10] Jito Labs is a key infrastructure development company within the ecosystem, known for its liquid staking protocol and Maximum Extractable Value (MEV) products. [11]​

As CLO, Rettig is responsible for overseeing the company's legal, compliance, and public policy strategies. Her appointment was seen as a strategic move by Labs to increase its policy and lobbying presence in Washington D.C. and navigate the evolving crypto regulatory environment. [11] [3]​

In the announcement of her hiring, Jito Labs CEO stated, "Rebecca’s impressive background and deep understanding of the legal intricacies of the crypto world make her the perfect fit to lead our legal efforts... Her experience will be invaluable as we continue to innovate and grow the Network.” [10]​

In March 2025, Rettig commented on the company's increased engagement, stating, "We think it's really important for protocols to be able to talk to policymakers and to regulators to explain what it is that we're doing. It's a mistake to just assume that this technology is understood." [11]​

Industry Advocacy and Advisory Roles

Rettig is actively involved in shaping policy and education for the industry through numerous advisory and board positions.

  • Government Advisory: She has been appointed to serve on advisory committees for U.S. federal and state regulators. These roles include membership on the Digital Asset Markets Subcommittee of the Global Markets Advisory Committee for the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and membership on the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) Virtual Currency Advisory Group. [8] [12]
  • Board Memberships: Rettig serves as a board member for the DeFi Education Fund, a 501(c)(4) advocacy organization that educates policymakers about . [2] She also serves as an Independent Director for the Foundation. [8] She previously sat on the advisory board of Silvergate Bank. [1] [7]
  • Strategic Advisor: She acts as a strategic advisor to FalconX, a financial services firm. [12]
  • Academia: As of 2024, Rettig serves as an Adjunct Professor of Law at her alma mater, Columbia Law School, where she co-teaches a course on and the law. [3]

These roles and affiliations demonstrate Rettig's influence and engagement across various sectors of the crypto ecosystem, from protocol development to regulatory policy and education. [8] [5]​

Public Speaking and Commentary

Rettig is a recognized public figure and a frequent speaker at major industry conferences, including and State of Crypto by , SALT, and events hosted by Blockworks. [2] [6] [12] She is known for her expert commentary on legal, regulatory, and policy issues facing the and broader ecosystems. Through her public appearances and social media presence, she advocates for clear and sensible regulations to foster innovation in the space. [2] [1]​

Awards and Recognition

Throughout her career, Rettig has received multiple accolades from legal ranking organizations. She has been ranked by Chambers and Partners for FinTech Legal & Crypto-Asset Disputes nationwide and by The Legal 500 for FinTech. [2] She was also named to Litigation's "40 & Under Hot List" and recognized as a "Rising Star" by Super Lawyers. [2] Additionally, Crain’s New York Business recognized her as one of its "Top Women Lawyers in New York City." [6]

Interviews

A New Era for Crypto Policy in the U.S.

On February 21, 2025, Rebecca Rettig participated in an interview on the YouTube channel Lightspeed, hosted by Jack HCK. The discussion addressed regulatory developments related to in the United States, her position at Labs, and policy considerations affecting the sector.

Rettig stated that her move to Labs, a developer of infrastructure within the ecosystem, was based on alignment with the organization’s structure and approach to decentralization. She compared this environment with her previous roles at organizations associated with the Ethereum ecosystem, indicating differences in operational structure and business organization.

She referred to a recent meeting with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), describing it as involving detailed discussions on exchange-traded products (ETFs), staking, and . According to Rettig, the interaction reflected a level of technical familiarity with these topics among regulatory staff. She indicated that such discussions may contribute to future regulatory guidance, including distinctions between custodial and non-custodial .

Rettig also commented on prior SEC enforcement approaches under Gary Gensler. She stated that regulatory actions during that period focused on established companies while, in her view, enforcement against fraudulent activities was less emphasized. She associated this approach with ongoing issues related to misconduct within the crypto sector.

Regarding the classification of digital assets, Rettig stated that native token (SOL), when not staked, would likely not meet the criteria of a security under frameworks such as the Howey test. She also noted that certain liquid staking mechanisms, particularly those operating through predefined and publicly accessible processes, may differ from models that rely on centralized management.

In relation to policy development, Rettig identified the need for clearer regulatory definitions concerning , custody, and market structure. She highlighted the concept of “control” in decentralized systems as a factor in determining the applicability of regulatory obligations.

The interview also included discussion of fraudulent practices and speculative activity associated with “meme coins.” Rettig stated that existing legal frameworks already address forms of market manipulation and noted that public visibility within blockchain systems can contribute to identifying such activity.

Rettig further addressed (DeFi), stating that it enables alternative methods of financial interaction that reduce reliance on intermediaries. She indicated that regulatory clarity, particularly regarding the role of control and responsibility within decentralized systems, is relevant to its continued development. [14]

Rebecca Rettig on U.S. Crypto Policy and Regulation #02

In an interview published on June 25, 2025, by Crypto in America, Rebecca Rettig, Chief Legal Officer at , discussed regulatory developments, legal practice, and policy considerations related to the sector in the United States. The statements presented reflect her perspective based on professional experience in both traditional legal environments and -related work.

Rettig described activity in the United States as associated with concepts such as economic participation and alternative financial systems. She noted that recent policy discussions have increasingly focused on establishing regulatory frameworks intended to address risks while allowing continued industry activity.

She characterized crypto law as a field that intersects multiple areas, including securities, commodities, payments, and sanctions. According to Rettig, legal work in this sector involves both regulatory analysis and familiarity with the technical and operational aspects of -based systems.

On the subject of decentralization, Rettig indicated that the term does not have a consistent legal definition and is often interpreted as a general principle rather than a formal standard. She stated that regulatory approaches may instead focus on specific activities and the degree of control exercised over user assets. In this context, she referenced the concept of “independent control” as a framework for assessing responsibility in cases involving centralized authority.

Regarding legislative developments, Rettig discussed proposals such as the and the . She noted that these initiatives address market structure and stablecoin regulation, while also highlighting that legislative processes remain ongoing and subject to revision.

Rettig also addressed the roles of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). She referred to recent regulatory guidance related to networks and activities, stating that such guidance addresses how certain operations are evaluated under existing regulatory frameworks.

In discussing digital assets, Rettig stated that may function as a form of digital payment instrument within existing financial systems. She distinguished stablecoins from tokenized bank deposits and noted that various forms of financial products, including derivatives associated with (DeFi), continue to be developed.

Rettig further observed that policy discussions in Washington, D.C. involve a range of participants, including industry representatives, advocacy groups, and regulators. She noted that this expansion of participation has contributed to a broader set of perspectives in legislative and regulatory discussions.

She also indicated that ongoing regulatory developments may influence how legal services are applied within the sector, with the possibility that certain issues could become integrated into standard business practices over time. [13]

A New Era for Crypto Policy in the U.S.

On February 21, 2025, Rebecca Rettig participated in an interview on the YouTube channel Lightspeed, hosted by Jack HCK. The discussion addressed regulatory developments related to in the United States, her position at Labs, and policy considerations affecting the sector.

Rettig stated that her move to Labs, a developer of infrastructure within the ecosystem, was based on alignment with the organization’s structure and approach to decentralization. She compared this environment with her previous roles at organizations associated with the Ethereum ecosystem, indicating differences in operational structure and business organization.

She referred to a recent meeting with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), describing it as involving detailed discussions on exchange-traded products (ETFs), staking, and . According to Rettig, the interaction reflected a level of technical familiarity with these topics among regulatory staff. She indicated that such discussions may contribute to future regulatory guidance, including distinctions between custodial and non-custodial .

Rettig also commented on prior SEC enforcement approaches under Gary Gensler. She stated that regulatory actions during that period focused on established companies while, in her view, enforcement against fraudulent activities was less emphasized. She associated this approach with ongoing issues related to misconduct within the crypto sector.

Regarding the classification of digital assets, Rettig stated that native token (SOL), when not staked, would likely not meet the criteria of a security under frameworks such as the Howey test. She also noted that certain liquid staking mechanisms, particularly those operating through predefined and publicly accessible processes, may differ from models that rely on centralized management.

In relation to policy development, Rettig identified the need for clearer regulatory definitions concerning , custody, and market structure. She highlighted the concept of “control” in decentralized systems as a factor in determining the applicability of regulatory obligations.

The interview also included discussion of fraudulent practices and speculative activity associated with “meme coins.” Rettig stated that existing legal frameworks already address forms of market manipulation and noted that public visibility within blockchain systems can contribute to identifying such activity.

Rettig further addressed (DeFi), stating that it enables alternative methods of financial interaction that reduce reliance on intermediaries. She indicated that regulatory clarity, particularly regarding the role of control and responsibility within decentralized systems, is relevant to its continued development. [14]

Rebecca Rettig on U.S. Crypto Policy and Regulation #02

In an interview published on June 25, 2025, by Crypto in America, Rebecca Rettig, Chief Legal Officer at , discussed regulatory developments, legal practice, and policy considerations related to the sector in the United States. The statements presented reflect her perspective based on professional experience in both traditional legal environments and -related work.

Rettig described activity in the United States as associated with concepts such as economic participation and alternative financial systems. She noted that recent policy discussions have increasingly focused on establishing regulatory frameworks intended to address risks while allowing continued industry activity.

She characterized crypto law as a field that intersects multiple areas, including securities, commodities, payments, and sanctions. According to Rettig, legal work in this sector involves both regulatory analysis and familiarity with the technical and operational aspects of -based systems.

On the subject of decentralization, Rettig indicated that the term does not have a consistent legal definition and is often interpreted as a general principle rather than a formal standard. She stated that regulatory approaches may instead focus on specific activities and the degree of control exercised over user assets. In this context, she referenced the concept of “independent control” as a framework for assessing responsibility in cases involving centralized authority.

Regarding legislative developments, Rettig discussed proposals such as the and the . She noted that these initiatives address market structure and stablecoin regulation, while also highlighting that legislative processes remain ongoing and subject to revision.

Rettig also addressed the roles of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). She referred to recent regulatory guidance related to networks and activities, stating that such guidance addresses how certain operations are evaluated under existing regulatory frameworks.

In discussing digital assets, Rettig stated that stablecoins may function as a form of digital payment instrument within existing financial systems. She distinguished stablecoins from tokenized bank deposits and noted that various forms of financial products, including derivatives associated with (DeFi), continue to be developed.

Rettig further observed that policy discussions in Washington, D.C. involve a range of participants, including industry representatives, advocacy groups, and regulators. She noted that this expansion of participation has contributed to a broader set of perspectives in legislative and regulatory discussions.

She also indicated that ongoing regulatory developments may influence how legal services are applied within the sector, with the possibility that certain issues could become integrated into standard business practices over time. [13]

A New Era for Crypto Policy in the U.S.

On February 21, 2025, Rebecca Rettig participated in an interview on the YouTube channel Lightspeed, hosted by Jack HCK. The discussion addressed regulatory developments related to in the United States, her position at Labs, and policy considerations affecting the sector.

Rettig stated that her move to Labs, a developer of infrastructure within the ecosystem, was based on alignment with the organization’s structure and approach to decentralization. She compared this environment with her previous roles at organizations associated with the Ethereum ecosystem, indicating differences in operational structure and business organization.

She referred to a recent meeting with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), describing it as involving detailed discussions on exchange-traded products (ETFs), staking, and . According to Rettig, the interaction reflected a level of technical familiarity with these topics among regulatory staff. She indicated that such discussions may contribute to future regulatory guidance, including distinctions between custodial and non-custodial .

Rettig also commented on prior SEC enforcement approaches under Gary Gensler. She stated that regulatory actions during that period focused on established companies while, in her view, enforcement against fraudulent activities was less emphasized. She associated this approach with ongoing issues related to misconduct within the crypto sector.

Regarding the classification of digital assets, Rettig stated that native token (SOL), when not staked, would likely not meet the criteria of a security under frameworks such as the Howey test. She also noted that certain liquid staking mechanisms, particularly those operating through predefined and publicly accessible processes, may differ from models that rely on centralized management.

In relation to policy development, Rettig identified the need for clearer regulatory definitions concerning , custody, and market structure. She highlighted the concept of “control” in decentralized systems as a factor in determining the applicability of regulatory obligations.

The interview also included discussion of fraudulent practices and speculative activity associated with “meme coins.” Rettig stated that existing legal frameworks already address forms of market manipulation and noted that public visibility within blockchain systems can contribute to identifying such activity.

Rettig further addressed (DeFi), stating that it enables alternative methods of financial interaction that reduce reliance on intermediaries. She indicated that regulatory clarity, particularly regarding the role of control and responsibility within decentralized systems, is relevant to its continued development. [14]

Rebecca Rettig on U.S. Crypto Policy and Regulation #02

In an interview published on June 25, 2025, by Crypto in America, Rebecca Rettig, Chief Legal Officer at , discussed regulatory developments, legal practice, and policy considerations related to the sector in the United States. The statements presented reflect her perspective based on professional experience in both traditional legal environments and -related work.

Rettig described activity in the United States as associated with concepts such as economic participation and alternative financial systems. She noted that recent policy discussions have increasingly focused on establishing regulatory frameworks intended to address risks while allowing continued industry activity.

She characterized crypto law as a field that intersects multiple areas, including securities, commodities, payments, and sanctions. According to Rettig, legal work in this sector involves both regulatory analysis and familiarity with the technical and operational aspects of -based systems.

On the subject of decentralization, Rettig indicated that the term does not have a consistent legal definition and is often interpreted as a general principle rather than a formal standard. She stated that regulatory approaches may instead focus on specific activities and the degree of control exercised over user assets. In this context, she referenced the concept of “independent control” as a framework for assessing responsibility in cases involving centralized authority.

Regarding legislative developments, Rettig discussed proposals such as the and the . She noted that these initiatives address market structure and stablecoin regulation, while also highlighting that legislative processes remain ongoing and subject to revision.

Rettig also addressed the roles of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). She referred to recent regulatory guidance related to networks and activities, stating that such guidance addresses how certain operations are evaluated under existing regulatory frameworks.

In discussing digital assets, Rettig stated that stablecoins may function as a form of digital payment instrument within existing financial systems. She distinguished stablecoins from tokenized bank deposits and noted that various forms of financial products, including derivatives associated with decentralized finance (DeFi), continue to be developed.

Rettig further observed that policy discussions in Washington, D.C. involve a range of participants, including industry representatives, advocacy groups, and regulators. She noted that this expansion of participation has contributed to a broader set of perspectives in legislative and regulatory discussions.

She also indicated that ongoing regulatory developments may influence how legal services are applied within the sector, with the possibility that certain issues could become integrated into standard business practices over time. [13]

A New Era for Crypto Policy in the U.S.

On February 21, 2025, Rebecca Rettig participated in an interview on the YouTube channel Lightspeed, hosted by Jack HCK. The discussion addressed regulatory developments related to in the United States, her position at Labs, and policy considerations affecting the sector.

Rettig stated that her move to Labs, a developer of infrastructure within the ecosystem, was based on alignment with the organization’s structure and approach to decentralization. She compared this environment with her previous roles at organizations associated with the Ethereum ecosystem, indicating differences in operational structure and business organization.

She referred to a recent meeting with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), describing it as involving detailed discussions on exchange-traded products (ETFs), staking, and . According to Rettig, the interaction reflected a level of technical familiarity with these topics among regulatory staff. She indicated that such discussions may contribute to future regulatory guidance, including distinctions between custodial and non-custodial .

Rettig also commented on prior SEC enforcement approaches under Gary Gensler. She stated that regulatory actions during that period focused on established companies while, in her view, enforcement against fraudulent activities was less emphasized. She associated this approach with ongoing issues related to misconduct within the crypto sector.

Regarding the classification of digital assets, Rettig stated that native token (SOL), when not staked, would likely not meet the criteria of a security under frameworks such as the Howey test. She also noted that certain liquid staking mechanisms, particularly those operating through predefined and publicly accessible processes, may differ from models that rely on centralized management.

In relation to policy development, Rettig identified the need for clearer regulatory definitions concerning , custody, and market structure. She highlighted the concept of “control” in decentralized systems as a factor in determining the applicability of regulatory obligations.

The interview also included discussion of fraudulent practices and speculative activity associated with “meme coins.” Rettig stated that existing legal frameworks already address forms of market manipulation and noted that public visibility within blockchain systems can contribute to identifying such activity.

Rettig further addressed decentralized finance (DeFi), stating that it enables alternative methods of financial interaction that reduce reliance on intermediaries. She indicated that regulatory clarity, particularly regarding the role of control and responsibility within decentralized systems, is relevant to its continued development. [14]

Rebecca Rettig on U.S. Crypto Policy and Regulation #02

In an interview published on June 25, 2025, by Crypto in America, Rebecca Rettig, Chief Legal Officer at , discussed regulatory developments, legal practice, and policy considerations related to the sector in the United States. The statements presented reflect her perspective based on professional experience in both traditional legal environments and -related work.

Rettig described activity in the United States as associated with concepts such as economic participation and alternative financial systems. She noted that recent policy discussions have increasingly focused on establishing regulatory frameworks intended to address risks while allowing continued industry activity.

She characterized crypto law as a field that intersects multiple areas, including securities, commodities, payments, and sanctions. According to Rettig, legal work in this sector involves both regulatory analysis and familiarity with the technical and operational aspects of -based systems.

On the subject of decentralization, Rettig indicated that the term does not have a consistent legal definition and is often interpreted as a general principle rather than a formal standard. She stated that regulatory approaches may instead focus on specific activities and the degree of control exercised over user assets. In this context, she referenced the concept of “independent control” as a framework for assessing responsibility in cases involving centralized authority.

Regarding legislative developments, Rettig discussed proposals such as the and the . She noted that these initiatives address market structure and stablecoin regulation, while also highlighting that legislative processes remain ongoing and subject to revision.

Rettig also addressed the roles of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). She referred to recent regulatory guidance related to networks and activities, stating that such guidance addresses how certain operations are evaluated under existing regulatory frameworks.

In discussing digital assets, Rettig stated that stablecoins may function as a form of digital payment instrument within existing financial systems. She distinguished stablecoins from tokenized bank deposits and noted that various forms of financial products, including derivatives associated with decentralized finance (DeFi), continue to be developed.

Rettig further observed that policy discussions in Washington, D.C. involve a range of participants, including industry representatives, advocacy groups, and regulators. She noted that this expansion of participation has contributed to a broader set of perspectives in legislative and regulatory discussions.

She also indicated that ongoing regulatory developments may influence how legal services are applied within the sector, with the possibility that certain issues could become integrated into standard business practices over time. [13]

A New Era for Crypto Policy in the U.S.

On February 21, 2025, Rebecca Rettig participated in an interview on the YouTube channel Lightspeed, hosted by Jack HCK. The discussion addressed regulatory developments related to in the United States, her position at Labs, and policy considerations affecting the sector.

Rettig stated that her move to Labs, a developer of infrastructure within the ecosystem, was based on alignment with the organization’s structure and approach to decentralization. She compared this environment with her previous roles at organizations associated with the Ethereum ecosystem, indicating differences in operational structure and business organization.

She referred to a recent meeting with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), describing it as involving detailed discussions on exchange-traded products (ETFs), staking, and . According to Rettig, the interaction reflected a level of technical familiarity with these topics among regulatory staff. She indicated that such discussions may contribute to future regulatory guidance, including distinctions between custodial and non-custodial .

Rettig also commented on prior SEC enforcement approaches under Gary Gensler. She stated that regulatory actions during that period focused on established companies while, in her view, enforcement against fraudulent activities was less emphasized. She associated this approach with ongoing issues related to misconduct within the crypto sector.

Regarding the classification of digital assets, Rettig stated that native token (SOL), when not staked, would likely not meet the criteria of a security under frameworks such as the Howey test. She also noted that certain liquid staking mechanisms, particularly those operating through predefined and publicly accessible processes, may differ from models that rely on centralized management.

In relation to policy development, Rettig identified the need for clearer regulatory definitions concerning staking, custody, and market structure. She highlighted the concept of “control” in decentralized systems as a factor in determining the applicability of regulatory obligations.

The interview also included discussion of fraudulent practices and speculative activity associated with “meme coins.” Rettig stated that existing legal frameworks already address forms of market manipulation and noted that public visibility within blockchain systems can contribute to identifying such activity.

Rettig further addressed decentralized finance (DeFi), stating that it enables alternative methods of financial interaction that reduce reliance on intermediaries. She indicated that regulatory clarity, particularly regarding the role of control and responsibility within decentralized systems, is relevant to its continued development. [14]

Rebecca Rettig on U.S. Crypto Policy and Regulation #02

In an interview published on June 25, 2025, by Crypto in America, Rebecca Rettig, Chief Legal Officer at , discussed regulatory developments, legal practice, and policy considerations related to the sector in the United States. The statements presented reflect her perspective based on professional experience in both traditional legal environments and -related work.

Rettig described activity in the United States as associated with concepts such as economic participation and alternative financial systems. She noted that recent policy discussions have increasingly focused on establishing regulatory frameworks intended to address risks while allowing continued industry activity.

She characterized crypto law as a field that intersects multiple areas, including securities, commodities, payments, and sanctions. According to Rettig, legal work in this sector involves both regulatory analysis and familiarity with the technical and operational aspects of -based systems.

On the subject of decentralization, Rettig indicated that the term does not have a consistent legal definition and is often interpreted as a general principle rather than a formal standard. She stated that regulatory approaches may instead focus on specific activities and the degree of control exercised over user assets. In this context, she referenced the concept of “independent control” as a framework for assessing responsibility in cases involving centralized authority.

Regarding legislative developments, Rettig discussed proposals such as the and the . She noted that these initiatives address market structure and stablecoin regulation, while also highlighting that legislative processes remain ongoing and subject to revision.

Rettig also addressed the roles of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). She referred to recent regulatory guidance related to networks and activities, stating that such guidance addresses how certain operations are evaluated under existing regulatory frameworks.

In discussing digital assets, Rettig stated that stablecoins may function as a form of digital payment instrument within existing financial systems. She distinguished stablecoins from tokenized bank deposits and noted that various forms of financial products, including derivatives associated with decentralized finance (DeFi), continue to be developed.

Rettig further observed that policy discussions in Washington, D.C. involve a range of participants, including industry representatives, advocacy groups, and regulators. She noted that this expansion of participation has contributed to a broader set of perspectives in legislative and regulatory discussions.

She also indicated that ongoing regulatory developments may influence how legal services are applied within the sector, with the possibility that certain issues could become integrated into standard business practices over time. [13]

A New Era for Crypto Policy in the U.S.

On February 21, 2025, Rebecca Rettig participated in an interview on the YouTube channel Lightspeed, hosted by Jack HCK. The discussion addressed regulatory developments related to in the United States, her position at Labs, and policy considerations affecting the sector.

Rettig stated that her move to Labs, a developer of infrastructure within the ecosystem, was based on alignment with the organization’s structure and approach to decentralization. She compared this environment with her previous roles at organizations associated with the Ethereum ecosystem, indicating differences in operational structure and business organization.

She referred to a recent meeting with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), describing it as involving detailed discussions on exchange-traded products (ETFs), staking, and . According to Rettig, the interaction reflected a level of technical familiarity with these topics among regulatory staff. She indicated that such discussions may contribute to future regulatory guidance, including distinctions between custodial and non-custodial .

Rettig also commented on prior SEC enforcement approaches under Gary Gensler. She stated that regulatory actions during that period focused on established companies while, in her view, enforcement against fraudulent activities was less emphasized. She associated this approach with ongoing issues related to misconduct within the crypto sector.

Regarding the classification of digital assets, Rettig stated that Solana’s native token (SOL), when not staked, would likely not meet the criteria of a security under frameworks such as the Howey test. She also noted that certain liquid staking mechanisms, particularly those operating through predefined and publicly accessible processes, may differ from models that rely on centralized management.

In relation to policy development, Rettig identified the need for clearer regulatory definitions concerning staking, custody, and market structure. She highlighted the concept of “control” in decentralized systems as a factor in determining the applicability of regulatory obligations.

The interview also included discussion of fraudulent practices and speculative activity associated with “meme coins.” Rettig stated that existing legal frameworks already address forms of market manipulation and noted that public visibility within blockchain systems can contribute to identifying such activity.

Rettig further addressed decentralized finance (DeFi), stating that it enables alternative methods of financial interaction that reduce reliance on intermediaries. She indicated that regulatory clarity, particularly regarding the role of control and responsibility within decentralized systems, is relevant to its continued development. [14]

Rebecca Rettig on U.S. Crypto Policy and Regulation #02

In an interview published on June 25, 2025, by Crypto in America, Rebecca Rettig, Chief Legal Officer at , discussed regulatory developments, legal practice, and policy considerations related to the sector in the United States. The statements presented reflect her perspective based on professional experience in both traditional legal environments and -related work.

Rettig described activity in the United States as associated with concepts such as economic participation and alternative financial systems. She noted that recent policy discussions have increasingly focused on establishing regulatory frameworks intended to address risks while allowing continued industry activity.

She characterized crypto law as a field that intersects multiple areas, including securities, commodities, payments, and sanctions. According to Rettig, legal work in this sector involves both regulatory analysis and familiarity with the technical and operational aspects of -based systems.

On the subject of decentralization, Rettig indicated that the term does not have a consistent legal definition and is often interpreted as a general principle rather than a formal standard. She stated that regulatory approaches may instead focus on specific activities and the degree of control exercised over user assets. In this context, she referenced the concept of “independent control” as a framework for assessing responsibility in cases involving centralized authority.

Regarding legislative developments, Rettig discussed proposals such as the and the . She noted that these initiatives address market structure and stablecoin regulation, while also highlighting that legislative processes remain ongoing and subject to revision.

Rettig also addressed the roles of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). She referred to recent regulatory guidance related to networks and activities, stating that such guidance addresses how certain operations are evaluated under existing regulatory frameworks.

In discussing digital assets, Rettig stated that stablecoins may function as a form of digital payment instrument within existing financial systems. She distinguished stablecoins from tokenized bank deposits and noted that various forms of financial products, including derivatives associated with decentralized finance (DeFi), continue to be developed.

Rettig further observed that policy discussions in Washington, D.C. involve a range of participants, including industry representatives, advocacy groups, and regulators. She noted that this expansion of participation has contributed to a broader set of perspectives in legislative and regulatory discussions.

She also indicated that ongoing regulatory developments may influence how legal services are applied within the sector, with the possibility that certain issues could become integrated into standard business practices over time. [13]

A New Era for Crypto Policy in the U.S.

On February 21, 2025, Rebecca Rettig participated in an interview on the YouTube channel Lightspeed, hosted by Jack HCK. The discussion addressed regulatory developments related to in the United States, her position at Labs, and policy considerations affecting the sector.

Rettig stated that her move to Labs, a developer of infrastructure within the ecosystem, was based on alignment with the organization’s structure and approach to decentralization. She compared this environment with her previous roles at organizations associated with the Ethereum ecosystem, indicating differences in operational structure and business organization.

She referred to a recent meeting with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), describing it as involving detailed discussions on exchange-traded products (ETFs), staking, and . According to Rettig, the interaction reflected a level of technical familiarity with these topics among regulatory staff. She indicated that such discussions may contribute to future regulatory guidance, including distinctions between custodial and non-custodial staking.

Rettig also commented on prior SEC enforcement approaches under Gary Gensler. She stated that regulatory actions during that period focused on established companies while, in her view, enforcement against fraudulent activities was less emphasized. She associated this approach with ongoing issues related to misconduct within the crypto sector.

Regarding the classification of digital assets, Rettig stated that Solana’s native token (SOL), when not staked, would likely not meet the criteria of a security under frameworks such as the Howey test. She also noted that certain liquid staking mechanisms, particularly those operating through predefined and publicly accessible processes, may differ from models that rely on centralized management.

In relation to policy development, Rettig identified the need for clearer regulatory definitions concerning staking, custody, and market structure. She highlighted the concept of “control” in decentralized systems as a factor in determining the applicability of regulatory obligations.

The interview also included discussion of fraudulent practices and speculative activity associated with “meme coins.” Rettig stated that existing legal frameworks already address forms of market manipulation and noted that public visibility within blockchain systems can contribute to identifying such activity.

Rettig further addressed decentralized finance (DeFi), stating that it enables alternative methods of financial interaction that reduce reliance on intermediaries. She indicated that regulatory clarity, particularly regarding the role of control and responsibility within decentralized systems, is relevant to its continued development. [14]

Rebecca Rettig on U.S. Crypto Policy and Regulation #02

In an interview published on June 25, 2025, by Crypto in America, Rebecca Rettig, Chief Legal Officer at , discussed regulatory developments, legal practice, and policy considerations related to the sector in the United States. The statements presented reflect her perspective based on professional experience in both traditional legal environments and -related work.

Rettig described activity in the United States as associated with concepts such as economic participation and alternative financial systems. She noted that recent policy discussions have increasingly focused on establishing regulatory frameworks intended to address risks while allowing continued industry activity.

She characterized crypto law as a field that intersects multiple areas, including securities, commodities, payments, and sanctions. According to Rettig, legal work in this sector involves both regulatory analysis and familiarity with the technical and operational aspects of -based systems.

On the subject of decentralization, Rettig indicated that the term does not have a consistent legal definition and is often interpreted as a general principle rather than a formal standard. She stated that regulatory approaches may instead focus on specific activities and the degree of control exercised over user assets. In this context, she referenced the concept of “independent control” as a framework for assessing responsibility in cases involving centralized authority.

Regarding legislative developments, Rettig discussed proposals such as the and the . She noted that these initiatives address market structure and stablecoin regulation, while also highlighting that legislative processes remain ongoing and subject to revision.

Rettig also addressed the roles of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). She referred to recent regulatory guidance related to networks and activities, stating that such guidance addresses how certain operations are evaluated under existing regulatory frameworks.

In discussing digital assets, Rettig stated that stablecoins may function as a form of digital payment instrument within existing financial systems. She distinguished stablecoins from tokenized bank deposits and noted that various forms of financial products, including derivatives associated with decentralized finance (DeFi), continue to be developed.

Rettig further observed that policy discussions in Washington, D.C. involve a range of participants, including industry representatives, advocacy groups, and regulators. She noted that this expansion of participation has contributed to a broader set of perspectives in legislative and regulatory discussions.

She also indicated that ongoing regulatory developments may influence how legal services are applied within the sector, with the possibility that certain issues could become integrated into standard business practices over time. [13]

A New Era for Crypto Policy in the U.S.

On February 21, 2025, Rebecca Rettig participated in an interview on the YouTube channel Lightspeed, hosted by Jack HCK. The discussion addressed regulatory developments related to in the United States, her position at Labs, and policy considerations affecting the sector.

Rettig stated that her move to Labs, a developer of infrastructure within the ecosystem, was based on alignment with the organization’s structure and approach to decentralization. She compared this environment with her previous roles at organizations associated with the Ethereum ecosystem, indicating differences in operational structure and business organization.

She referred to a recent meeting with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), describing it as involving detailed discussions on exchange-traded products (ETFs), staking, and liquid staking. According to Rettig, the interaction reflected a level of technical familiarity with these topics among regulatory staff. She indicated that such discussions may contribute to future regulatory guidance, including distinctions between custodial and non-custodial staking.

Rettig also commented on prior SEC enforcement approaches under Gary Gensler. She stated that regulatory actions during that period focused on established companies while, in her view, enforcement against fraudulent activities was less emphasized. She associated this approach with ongoing issues related to misconduct within the crypto sector.

Regarding the classification of digital assets, Rettig stated that Solana’s native token (SOL), when not staked, would likely not meet the criteria of a security under frameworks such as the Howey test. She also noted that certain liquid staking mechanisms, particularly those operating through predefined and publicly accessible processes, may differ from models that rely on centralized management.

In relation to policy development, Rettig identified the need for clearer regulatory definitions concerning staking, custody, and market structure. She highlighted the concept of “control” in decentralized systems as a factor in determining the applicability of regulatory obligations.

The interview also included discussion of fraudulent practices and speculative activity associated with “meme coins.” Rettig stated that existing legal frameworks already address forms of market manipulation and noted that public visibility within blockchain systems can contribute to identifying such activity.

Rettig further addressed decentralized finance (DeFi), stating that it enables alternative methods of financial interaction that reduce reliance on intermediaries. She indicated that regulatory clarity, particularly regarding the role of control and responsibility within decentralized systems, is relevant to its continued development. [14]

Rebecca Rettig on U.S. Crypto Policy and Regulation #02

In an interview published on June 25, 2025, by Crypto in America, Rebecca Rettig, Chief Legal Officer at , discussed regulatory developments, legal practice, and policy considerations related to the sector in the United States. The statements presented reflect her perspective based on professional experience in both traditional legal environments and -related work.

Rettig described activity in the United States as associated with concepts such as economic participation and alternative financial systems. She noted that recent policy discussions have increasingly focused on establishing regulatory frameworks intended to address risks while allowing continued industry activity.

She characterized crypto law as a field that intersects multiple areas, including securities, commodities, payments, and sanctions. According to Rettig, legal work in this sector involves both regulatory analysis and familiarity with the technical and operational aspects of -based systems.

On the subject of decentralization, Rettig indicated that the term does not have a consistent legal definition and is often interpreted as a general principle rather than a formal standard. She stated that regulatory approaches may instead focus on specific activities and the degree of control exercised over user assets. In this context, she referenced the concept of “independent control” as a framework for assessing responsibility in cases involving centralized authority.

Regarding legislative developments, Rettig discussed proposals such as the and the . She noted that these initiatives address market structure and stablecoin regulation, while also highlighting that legislative processes remain ongoing and subject to revision.

Rettig also addressed the roles of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). She referred to recent regulatory guidance related to networks and activities, stating that such guidance addresses how certain operations are evaluated under existing regulatory frameworks.

In discussing digital assets, Rettig stated that stablecoins may function as a form of digital payment instrument within existing financial systems. She distinguished stablecoins from tokenized bank deposits and noted that various forms of financial products, including derivatives associated with decentralized finance (DeFi), continue to be developed.

Rettig further observed that policy discussions in Washington, D.C. involve a range of participants, including industry representatives, advocacy groups, and regulators. She noted that this expansion of participation has contributed to a broader set of perspectives in legislative and regulatory discussions.

She also indicated that ongoing regulatory developments may influence how legal services are applied within the sector, with the possibility that certain issues could become integrated into standard business practices over time. [13]

A New Era for Crypto Policy in the U.S.

On February 21, 2025, Rebecca Rettig participated in an interview on the YouTube channel Lightspeed, hosted by Jack HCK. The discussion addressed regulatory developments related to in the United States, her position at Labs, and policy considerations affecting the sector.

Rettig stated that her move to Labs, a developer of infrastructure within the Solana ecosystem, was based on alignment with the organization’s structure and approach to decentralization. She compared this environment with her previous roles at organizations associated with the Ethereum ecosystem, indicating differences in operational structure and business organization.

She referred to a recent meeting with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), describing it as involving detailed discussions on exchange-traded products (ETFs), staking, and liquid staking. According to Rettig, the interaction reflected a level of technical familiarity with these topics among regulatory staff. She indicated that such discussions may contribute to future regulatory guidance, including distinctions between custodial and non-custodial staking.

Rettig also commented on prior SEC enforcement approaches under Gary Gensler. She stated that regulatory actions during that period focused on established companies while, in her view, enforcement against fraudulent activities was less emphasized. She associated this approach with ongoing issues related to misconduct within the crypto sector.

Regarding the classification of digital assets, Rettig stated that Solana’s native token (SOL), when not staked, would likely not meet the criteria of a security under frameworks such as the Howey test. She also noted that certain liquid staking mechanisms, particularly those operating through predefined and publicly accessible processes, may differ from models that rely on centralized management.

In relation to policy development, Rettig identified the need for clearer regulatory definitions concerning staking, custody, and market structure. She highlighted the concept of “control” in decentralized systems as a factor in determining the applicability of regulatory obligations.

The interview also included discussion of fraudulent practices and speculative activity associated with “meme coins.” Rettig stated that existing legal frameworks already address forms of market manipulation and noted that public visibility within blockchain systems can contribute to identifying such activity.

Rettig further addressed decentralized finance (DeFi), stating that it enables alternative methods of financial interaction that reduce reliance on intermediaries. She indicated that regulatory clarity, particularly regarding the role of control and responsibility within decentralized systems, is relevant to its continued development. [14]

Rebecca Rettig on U.S. Crypto Policy and Regulation #02

In an interview published on June 25, 2025, by Crypto in America, Rebecca Rettig, Chief Legal Officer at , discussed regulatory developments, legal practice, and policy considerations related to the sector in the United States. The statements presented reflect her perspective based on professional experience in both traditional legal environments and -related work.

Rettig described activity in the United States as associated with concepts such as economic participation and alternative financial systems. She noted that recent policy discussions have increasingly focused on establishing regulatory frameworks intended to address risks while allowing continued industry activity.

She characterized crypto law as a field that intersects multiple areas, including securities, commodities, payments, and sanctions. According to Rettig, legal work in this sector involves both regulatory analysis and familiarity with the technical and operational aspects of -based systems.

On the subject of decentralization, Rettig indicated that the term does not have a consistent legal definition and is often interpreted as a general principle rather than a formal standard. She stated that regulatory approaches may instead focus on specific activities and the degree of control exercised over user assets. In this context, she referenced the concept of “independent control” as a framework for assessing responsibility in cases involving centralized authority.

Regarding legislative developments, Rettig discussed proposals such as the and the . She noted that these initiatives address market structure and stablecoin regulation, while also highlighting that legislative processes remain ongoing and subject to revision.

Rettig also addressed the roles of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). She referred to recent regulatory guidance related to networks and activities, stating that such guidance addresses how certain operations are evaluated under existing regulatory frameworks.

In discussing digital assets, Rettig stated that stablecoins may function as a form of digital payment instrument within existing financial systems. She distinguished stablecoins from tokenized bank deposits and noted that various forms of financial products, including derivatives associated with decentralized finance (DeFi), continue to be developed.

Rettig further observed that policy discussions in Washington, D.C. involve a range of participants, including industry representatives, advocacy groups, and regulators. She noted that this expansion of participation has contributed to a broader set of perspectives in legislative and regulatory discussions.

She also indicated that ongoing regulatory developments may influence how legal services are applied within the sector, with the possibility that certain issues could become integrated into standard business practices over time. [13]

A New Era for Crypto Policy in the U.S.

On February 21, 2025, Rebecca Rettig participated in an interview on the YouTube channel Lightspeed, hosted by Jack HCK. The discussion addressed regulatory developments related to in the United States, her position at Labs, and policy considerations affecting the sector.

Rettig stated that her move to Jito Labs, a developer of infrastructure within the Solana ecosystem, was based on alignment with the organization’s structure and approach to decentralization. She compared this environment with her previous roles at organizations associated with the Ethereum ecosystem, indicating differences in operational structure and business organization.

She referred to a recent meeting with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), describing it as involving detailed discussions on exchange-traded products (ETFs), staking, and liquid staking. According to Rettig, the interaction reflected a level of technical familiarity with these topics among regulatory staff. She indicated that such discussions may contribute to future regulatory guidance, including distinctions between custodial and non-custodial staking.

Rettig also commented on prior SEC enforcement approaches under Gary Gensler. She stated that regulatory actions during that period focused on established companies while, in her view, enforcement against fraudulent activities was less emphasized. She associated this approach with ongoing issues related to misconduct within the crypto sector.

Regarding the classification of digital assets, Rettig stated that Solana’s native token (SOL), when not staked, would likely not meet the criteria of a security under frameworks such as the Howey test. She also noted that certain liquid staking mechanisms, particularly those operating through predefined and publicly accessible processes, may differ from models that rely on centralized management.

In relation to policy development, Rettig identified the need for clearer regulatory definitions concerning staking, custody, and market structure. She highlighted the concept of “control” in decentralized systems as a factor in determining the applicability of regulatory obligations.

The interview also included discussion of fraudulent practices and speculative activity associated with “meme coins.” Rettig stated that existing legal frameworks already address forms of market manipulation and noted that public visibility within blockchain systems can contribute to identifying such activity.

Rettig further addressed decentralized finance (DeFi), stating that it enables alternative methods of financial interaction that reduce reliance on intermediaries. She indicated that regulatory clarity, particularly regarding the role of control and responsibility within decentralized systems, is relevant to its continued development. [14]

Rebecca Rettig on U.S. Crypto Policy and Regulation #02

In an interview published on June 25, 2025, by Crypto in America, Rebecca Rettig, Chief Legal Officer at , discussed regulatory developments, legal practice, and policy considerations related to the sector in the United States. The statements presented reflect her perspective based on professional experience in both traditional legal environments and -related work.

Rettig described activity in the United States as associated with concepts such as economic participation and alternative financial systems. She noted that recent policy discussions have increasingly focused on establishing regulatory frameworks intended to address risks while allowing continued industry activity.

She characterized crypto law as a field that intersects multiple areas, including securities, commodities, payments, and sanctions. According to Rettig, legal work in this sector involves both regulatory analysis and familiarity with the technical and operational aspects of -based systems.

On the subject of decentralization, Rettig indicated that the term does not have a consistent legal definition and is often interpreted as a general principle rather than a formal standard. She stated that regulatory approaches may instead focus on specific activities and the degree of control exercised over user assets. In this context, she referenced the concept of “independent control” as a framework for assessing responsibility in cases involving centralized authority.

Regarding legislative developments, Rettig discussed proposals such as the and the . She noted that these initiatives address market structure and stablecoin regulation, while also highlighting that legislative processes remain ongoing and subject to revision.

Rettig also addressed the roles of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). She referred to recent regulatory guidance related to networks and activities, stating that such guidance addresses how certain operations are evaluated under existing regulatory frameworks.

In discussing digital assets, Rettig stated that stablecoins may function as a form of digital payment instrument within existing financial systems. She distinguished stablecoins from tokenized bank deposits and noted that various forms of financial products, including derivatives associated with decentralized finance (DeFi), continue to be developed.

Rettig further observed that policy discussions in Washington, D.C. involve a range of participants, including industry representatives, advocacy groups, and regulators. She noted that this expansion of participation has contributed to a broader set of perspectives in legislative and regulatory discussions.

She also indicated that ongoing regulatory developments may influence how legal services are applied within the sector, with the possibility that certain issues could become integrated into standard business practices over time. [13]

A New Era for Crypto Policy in the U.S.

On February 21, 2025, Rebecca Rettig participated in an interview on the YouTube channel Lightspeed, hosted by Jack HCK. The discussion addressed regulatory developments related to in the United States, her position at Jito Labs, and policy considerations affecting the sector.

Rettig stated that her move to Jito Labs, a developer of infrastructure within the Solana ecosystem, was based on alignment with the organization’s structure and approach to decentralization. She compared this environment with her previous roles at organizations associated with the Ethereum ecosystem, indicating differences in operational structure and business organization.

She referred to a recent meeting with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), describing it as involving detailed discussions on exchange-traded products (ETFs), staking, and liquid staking. According to Rettig, the interaction reflected a level of technical familiarity with these topics among regulatory staff. She indicated that such discussions may contribute to future regulatory guidance, including distinctions between custodial and non-custodial staking.

Rettig also commented on prior SEC enforcement approaches under Gary Gensler. She stated that regulatory actions during that period focused on established companies while, in her view, enforcement against fraudulent activities was less emphasized. She associated this approach with ongoing issues related to misconduct within the crypto sector.

Regarding the classification of digital assets, Rettig stated that Solana’s native token (SOL), when not staked, would likely not meet the criteria of a security under frameworks such as the Howey test. She also noted that certain liquid staking mechanisms, particularly those operating through predefined and publicly accessible processes, may differ from models that rely on centralized management.

In relation to policy development, Rettig identified the need for clearer regulatory definitions concerning staking, custody, and market structure. She highlighted the concept of “control” in decentralized systems as a factor in determining the applicability of regulatory obligations.

The interview also included discussion of fraudulent practices and speculative activity associated with “meme coins.” Rettig stated that existing legal frameworks already address forms of market manipulation and noted that public visibility within blockchain systems can contribute to identifying such activity.

Rettig further addressed decentralized finance (DeFi), stating that it enables alternative methods of financial interaction that reduce reliance on intermediaries. She indicated that regulatory clarity, particularly regarding the role of control and responsibility within decentralized systems, is relevant to its continued development. [14]

Rebecca Rettig on U.S. Crypto Policy and Regulation #02

In an interview published on June 25, 2025, by Crypto in America, Rebecca Rettig, Chief Legal Officer at , discussed regulatory developments, legal practice, and policy considerations related to the sector in the United States. The statements presented reflect her perspective based on professional experience in both traditional legal environments and -related work.

Rettig described activity in the United States as associated with concepts such as economic participation and alternative financial systems. She noted that recent policy discussions have increasingly focused on establishing regulatory frameworks intended to address risks while allowing continued industry activity.

She characterized crypto law as a field that intersects multiple areas, including securities, commodities, payments, and sanctions. According to Rettig, legal work in this sector involves both regulatory analysis and familiarity with the technical and operational aspects of -based systems.

On the subject of decentralization, Rettig indicated that the term does not have a consistent legal definition and is often interpreted as a general principle rather than a formal standard. She stated that regulatory approaches may instead focus on specific activities and the degree of control exercised over user assets. In this context, she referenced the concept of “independent control” as a framework for assessing responsibility in cases involving centralized authority.

Regarding legislative developments, Rettig discussed proposals such as the and the . She noted that these initiatives address market structure and stablecoin regulation, while also highlighting that legislative processes remain ongoing and subject to revision.

Rettig also addressed the roles of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). She referred to recent regulatory guidance related to networks and activities, stating that such guidance addresses how certain operations are evaluated under existing regulatory frameworks.

In discussing digital assets, Rettig stated that stablecoins may function as a form of digital payment instrument within existing financial systems. She distinguished stablecoins from tokenized bank deposits and noted that various forms of financial products, including derivatives associated with decentralized finance (DeFi), continue to be developed.

Rettig further observed that policy discussions in Washington, D.C. involve a range of participants, including industry representatives, advocacy groups, and regulators. She noted that this expansion of participation has contributed to a broader set of perspectives in legislative and regulatory discussions.

She also indicated that ongoing regulatory developments may influence how legal services are applied within the sector, with the possibility that certain issues could become integrated into standard business practices over time. [13]

A New Era for Crypto Policy in the U.S.

On February 21, 2025, Rebecca Rettig participated in an interview on the YouTube channel Lightspeed, hosted by Jack HCK. The discussion addressed regulatory developments related to cryptocurrencies in the United States, her position at Jito Labs, and policy considerations affecting the sector.

Rettig stated that her move to Jito Labs, a developer of infrastructure within the Solana ecosystem, was based on alignment with the organization’s structure and approach to decentralization. She compared this environment with her previous roles at organizations associated with the Ethereum ecosystem, indicating differences in operational structure and business organization.

She referred to a recent meeting with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), describing it as involving detailed discussions on exchange-traded products (ETFs), staking, and liquid staking. According to Rettig, the interaction reflected a level of technical familiarity with these topics among regulatory staff. She indicated that such discussions may contribute to future regulatory guidance, including distinctions between custodial and non-custodial staking.

Rettig also commented on prior SEC enforcement approaches under Gary Gensler. She stated that regulatory actions during that period focused on established companies while, in her view, enforcement against fraudulent activities was less emphasized. She associated this approach with ongoing issues related to misconduct within the crypto sector.

Regarding the classification of digital assets, Rettig stated that Solana’s native token (SOL), when not staked, would likely not meet the criteria of a security under frameworks such as the Howey test. She also noted that certain liquid staking mechanisms, particularly those operating through predefined and publicly accessible processes, may differ from models that rely on centralized management.

In relation to policy development, Rettig identified the need for clearer regulatory definitions concerning staking, custody, and market structure. She highlighted the concept of “control” in decentralized systems as a factor in determining the applicability of regulatory obligations.

The interview also included discussion of fraudulent practices and speculative activity associated with “meme coins.” Rettig stated that existing legal frameworks already address forms of market manipulation and noted that public visibility within blockchain systems can contribute to identifying such activity.

Rettig further addressed decentralized finance (DeFi), stating that it enables alternative methods of financial interaction that reduce reliance on intermediaries. She indicated that regulatory clarity, particularly regarding the role of control and responsibility within decentralized systems, is relevant to its continued development. [14]

Rebecca Rettig on U.S. Crypto Policy and Regulation #02

In an interview published on June 25, 2025, by Crypto in America, Rebecca Rettig, Chief Legal Officer at , discussed regulatory developments, legal practice, and policy considerations related to the sector in the United States. The statements presented reflect her perspective based on professional experience in both traditional legal environments and -related work.

Rettig described activity in the United States as associated with concepts such as economic participation and alternative financial systems. She noted that recent policy discussions have increasingly focused on establishing regulatory frameworks intended to address risks while allowing continued industry activity.

She characterized crypto law as a field that intersects multiple areas, including securities, commodities, payments, and sanctions. According to Rettig, legal work in this sector involves both regulatory analysis and familiarity with the technical and operational aspects of -based systems.

On the subject of decentralization, Rettig indicated that the term does not have a consistent legal definition and is often interpreted as a general principle rather than a formal standard. She stated that regulatory approaches may instead focus on specific activities and the degree of control exercised over user assets. In this context, she referenced the concept of “independent control” as a framework for assessing responsibility in cases involving centralized authority.

Regarding legislative developments, Rettig discussed proposals such as the and the . She noted that these initiatives address market structure and stablecoin regulation, while also highlighting that legislative processes remain ongoing and subject to revision.

Rettig also addressed the roles of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). She referred to recent regulatory guidance related to networks and activities, stating that such guidance addresses how certain operations are evaluated under existing regulatory frameworks.

In discussing digital assets, Rettig stated that stablecoins may function as a form of digital payment instrument within existing financial systems. She distinguished stablecoins from tokenized bank deposits and noted that various forms of financial products, including derivatives associated with decentralized finance (DeFi), continue to be developed.

Rettig further observed that policy discussions in Washington, D.C. involve a range of participants, including industry representatives, advocacy groups, and regulators. She noted that this expansion of participation has contributed to a broader set of perspectives in legislative and regulatory discussions.

She also indicated that ongoing regulatory developments may influence how legal services are applied within the sector, with the possibility that certain issues could become integrated into standard business practices over time. [13]

A New Era for Crypto Policy in the U.S.

On February 21, 2025, Rebecca Rettig participated in an interview on the YouTube channel Lightspeed, hosted by Jack HCK. The discussion addressed regulatory developments related to cryptocurrencies in the United States, her position at Jito Labs, and policy considerations affecting the sector.

Rettig stated that her move to Jito Labs, a developer of infrastructure within the Solana ecosystem, was based on alignment with the organization’s structure and approach to decentralization. She compared this environment with her previous roles at organizations associated with the Ethereum ecosystem, indicating differences in operational structure and business organization.

She referred to a recent meeting with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), describing it as involving detailed discussions on exchange-traded products (ETFs), staking, and liquid staking. According to Rettig, the interaction reflected a level of technical familiarity with these topics among regulatory staff. She indicated that such discussions may contribute to future regulatory guidance, including distinctions between custodial and non-custodial staking.

Rettig also commented on prior SEC enforcement approaches under Gary Gensler. She stated that regulatory actions during that period focused on established companies while, in her view, enforcement against fraudulent activities was less emphasized. She associated this approach with ongoing issues related to misconduct within the crypto sector.

Regarding the classification of digital assets, Rettig stated that Solana’s native token (SOL), when not staked, would likely not meet the criteria of a security under frameworks such as the Howey test. She also noted that certain liquid staking mechanisms, particularly those operating through predefined and publicly accessible processes, may differ from models that rely on centralized management.

In relation to policy development, Rettig identified the need for clearer regulatory definitions concerning staking, custody, and market structure. She highlighted the concept of “control” in decentralized systems as a factor in determining the applicability of regulatory obligations.

The interview also included discussion of fraudulent practices and speculative activity associated with “meme coins.” Rettig stated that existing legal frameworks already address forms of market manipulation and noted that public visibility within blockchain systems can contribute to identifying such activity.

Rettig further addressed decentralized finance (DeFi), stating that it enables alternative methods of financial interaction that reduce reliance on intermediaries. She indicated that regulatory clarity, particularly regarding the role of control and responsibility within decentralized systems, is relevant to its continued development. [14]

Rebecca Rettig on U.S. Crypto Policy and Regulation #02

In an interview published on June 25, 2025, by Crypto in America, Rebecca Rettig, Chief Legal Officer at , discussed regulatory developments, legal practice, and policy considerations related to the sector in the United States. The statements presented reflect her perspective based on professional experience in both traditional legal environments and -related work.

Rettig described activity in the United States as associated with concepts such as economic participation and alternative financial systems. She noted that recent policy discussions have increasingly focused on establishing regulatory frameworks intended to address risks while allowing continued industry activity.

She characterized crypto law as a field that intersects multiple areas, including securities, commodities, payments, and sanctions. According to Rettig, legal work in this sector involves both regulatory analysis and familiarity with the technical and operational aspects of -based systems.

On the subject of decentralization, Rettig indicated that the term does not have a consistent legal definition and is often interpreted as a general principle rather than a formal standard. She stated that regulatory approaches may instead focus on specific activities and the degree of control exercised over user assets. In this context, she referenced the concept of “independent control” as a framework for assessing responsibility in cases involving centralized authority.

Regarding legislative developments, Rettig discussed proposals such as the and the . She noted that these initiatives address market structure and stablecoin regulation, while also highlighting that legislative processes remain ongoing and subject to revision.

Rettig also addressed the roles of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). She referred to recent regulatory guidance related to networks and activities, stating that such guidance addresses how certain operations are evaluated under existing regulatory frameworks.

In discussing digital assets, Rettig stated that stablecoins may function as a form of digital payment instrument within existing financial systems. She distinguished stablecoins from tokenized bank deposits and noted that various forms of financial products, including derivatives associated with decentralized finance (DeFi), continue to be developed.

Rettig further observed that policy discussions in Washington, D.C. involve a range of participants, including industry representatives, advocacy groups, and regulators. She noted that this expansion of participation has contributed to a broader set of perspectives in legislative and regulatory discussions.

She also indicated that ongoing regulatory developments may influence how legal services are applied within the sector, with the possibility that certain issues could become integrated into standard business practices over time. [13]

A New Era for Crypto Policy in the U.S.

On February 21, 2025, Rebecca Rettig participated in an interview on the YouTube channel Lightspeed, hosted by Jack HCK. The discussion addressed regulatory developments related to cryptocurrencies in the United States, her position at Jito Labs, and policy considerations affecting the sector.

Rettig stated that her move to Jito Labs, a developer of infrastructure within the Solana ecosystem, was based on alignment with the organization’s structure and approach to decentralization. She compared this environment with her previous roles at organizations associated with the Ethereum ecosystem, indicating differences in operational structure and business organization.

She referred to a recent meeting with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), describing it as involving detailed discussions on exchange-traded products (ETFs), staking, and liquid staking. According to Rettig, the interaction reflected a level of technical familiarity with these topics among regulatory staff. She indicated that such discussions may contribute to future regulatory guidance, including distinctions between custodial and non-custodial staking.

Rettig also commented on prior SEC enforcement approaches under Gary Gensler. She stated that regulatory actions during that period focused on established companies while, in her view, enforcement against fraudulent activities was less emphasized. She associated this approach with ongoing issues related to misconduct within the crypto sector.

Regarding the classification of digital assets, Rettig stated that Solana’s native token (SOL), when not staked, would likely not meet the criteria of a security under frameworks such as the Howey test. She also noted that certain liquid staking mechanisms, particularly those operating through predefined and publicly accessible processes, may differ from models that rely on centralized management.

In relation to policy development, Rettig identified the need for clearer regulatory definitions concerning staking, custody, and market structure. She highlighted the concept of “control” in decentralized systems as a factor in determining the applicability of regulatory obligations.

The interview also included discussion of fraudulent practices and speculative activity associated with “meme coins.” Rettig stated that existing legal frameworks already address forms of market manipulation and noted that public visibility within blockchain systems can contribute to identifying such activity.

Rettig further addressed decentralized finance (DeFi), stating that it enables alternative methods of financial interaction that reduce reliance on intermediaries. She indicated that regulatory clarity, particularly regarding the role of control and responsibility within decentralized systems, is relevant to its continued development. [14]

Rebecca Rettig on U.S. Crypto Policy and Regulation #02

In an interview published on June 25, 2025, by Crypto in America, Rebecca Rettig, Chief Legal Officer at , discussed regulatory developments, legal practice, and policy considerations related to the sector in the United States. The statements presented reflect her perspective based on professional experience in both traditional legal environments and -related work.

Rettig described activity in the United States as associated with concepts such as economic participation and alternative financial systems. She noted that recent policy discussions have increasingly focused on establishing regulatory frameworks intended to address risks while allowing continued industry activity.

She characterized crypto law as a field that intersects multiple areas, including securities, commodities, payments, and sanctions. According to Rettig, legal work in this sector involves both regulatory analysis and familiarity with the technical and operational aspects of -based systems.

On the subject of decentralization, Rettig indicated that the term does not have a consistent legal definition and is often interpreted as a general principle rather than a formal standard. She stated that regulatory approaches may instead focus on specific activities and the degree of control exercised over user assets. In this context, she referenced the concept of “independent control” as a framework for assessing responsibility in cases involving centralized authority.

Regarding legislative developments, Rettig discussed proposals such as the and the . She noted that these initiatives address market structure and stablecoin regulation, while also highlighting that legislative processes remain ongoing and subject to revision.

Rettig also addressed the roles of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). She referred to recent regulatory guidance related to networks and activities, stating that such guidance addresses how certain operations are evaluated under existing regulatory frameworks.

In discussing digital assets, Rettig stated that stablecoins may function as a form of digital payment instrument within existing financial systems. She distinguished stablecoins from tokenized bank deposits and noted that various forms of financial products, including derivatives associated with decentralized finance (DeFi), continue to be developed.

Rettig further observed that policy discussions in Washington, D.C. involve a range of participants, including industry representatives, advocacy groups, and regulators. She noted that this expansion of participation has contributed to a broader set of perspectives in legislative and regulatory discussions.

She also indicated that ongoing regulatory developments may influence how legal services are applied within the sector, with the possibility that certain issues could become integrated into standard business practices over time. [13]

A New Era for Crypto Policy in the U.S.

On February 21, 2025, Rebecca Rettig participated in an interview on the YouTube channel Lightspeed, hosted by Jack HCK. The discussion addressed regulatory developments related to cryptocurrencies in the United States, her position at Jito Labs, and policy considerations affecting the sector.

Rettig stated that her move to Jito Labs, a developer of infrastructure within the Solana ecosystem, was based on alignment with the organization’s structure and approach to decentralization. She compared this environment with her previous roles at organizations associated with the Ethereum ecosystem, indicating differences in operational structure and business organization.

She referred to a recent meeting with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), describing it as involving detailed discussions on exchange-traded products (ETFs), staking, and liquid staking. According to Rettig, the interaction reflected a level of technical familiarity with these topics among regulatory staff. She indicated that such discussions may contribute to future regulatory guidance, including distinctions between custodial and non-custodial staking.

Rettig also commented on prior SEC enforcement approaches under Gary Gensler. She stated that regulatory actions during that period focused on established companies while, in her view, enforcement against fraudulent activities was less emphasized. She associated this approach with ongoing issues related to misconduct within the crypto sector.

Regarding the classification of digital assets, Rettig stated that Solana’s native token (SOL), when not staked, would likely not meet the criteria of a security under frameworks such as the Howey test. She also noted that certain liquid staking mechanisms, particularly those operating through predefined and publicly accessible processes, may differ from models that rely on centralized management.

In relation to policy development, Rettig identified the need for clearer regulatory definitions concerning staking, custody, and market structure. She highlighted the concept of “control” in decentralized systems as a factor in determining the applicability of regulatory obligations.

The interview also included discussion of fraudulent practices and speculative activity associated with “meme coins.” Rettig stated that existing legal frameworks already address forms of market manipulation and noted that public visibility within blockchain systems can contribute to identifying such activity.

Rettig further addressed decentralized finance (DeFi), stating that it enables alternative methods of financial interaction that reduce reliance on intermediaries. She indicated that regulatory clarity, particularly regarding the role of control and responsibility within decentralized systems, is relevant to its continued development.

Rebecca Rettig on U.S. Crypto Policy and Regulation #02

In an interview published on June 25, 2025, by Crypto in America, Rebecca Rettig, Chief Legal Officer at , discussed regulatory developments, legal practice, and policy considerations related to the sector in the United States. The statements presented reflect her perspective based on professional experience in both traditional legal environments and -related work.

Rettig described activity in the United States as associated with concepts such as economic participation and alternative financial systems. She noted that recent policy discussions have increasingly focused on establishing regulatory frameworks intended to address risks while allowing continued industry activity.

She characterized crypto law as a field that intersects multiple areas, including securities, commodities, payments, and sanctions. According to Rettig, legal work in this sector involves both regulatory analysis and familiarity with the technical and operational aspects of -based systems.

On the subject of decentralization, Rettig indicated that the term does not have a consistent legal definition and is often interpreted as a general principle rather than a formal standard. She stated that regulatory approaches may instead focus on specific activities and the degree of control exercised over user assets. In this context, she referenced the concept of “independent control” as a framework for assessing responsibility in cases involving centralized authority.

Regarding legislative developments, Rettig discussed proposals such as the and the . She noted that these initiatives address market structure and stablecoin regulation, while also highlighting that legislative processes remain ongoing and subject to revision.

Rettig also addressed the roles of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). She referred to recent regulatory guidance related to networks and activities, stating that such guidance addresses how certain operations are evaluated under existing regulatory frameworks.

In discussing digital assets, Rettig stated that stablecoins may function as a form of digital payment instrument within existing financial systems. She distinguished stablecoins from tokenized bank deposits and noted that various forms of financial products, including derivatives associated with decentralized finance (DeFi), continue to be developed.

Rettig further observed that policy discussions in Washington, D.C. involve a range of participants, including industry representatives, advocacy groups, and regulators. She noted that this expansion of participation has contributed to a broader set of perspectives in legislative and regulatory discussions.

She also indicated that ongoing regulatory developments may influence how legal services are applied within the sector, with the possibility that certain issues could become integrated into standard business practices over time. [13]

REFERENCES

[1]
www.linkedin.com

LinkedIn profile for Rebecca Rettig

Mar 19, 2026

[2]
state-of-crypto.coindesk.com

CoinDesk speaker bio for Rebecca Rettig

Mar 19, 2026

[3]
www.theblock.co

The Block article on Rettig joining Jito Labs

Mar 19, 2026

[4]
rocketreach.co

RocketReach profile for Rebecca Rettig

Mar 19, 2026

[5]
www.rootdata.com

RootData profile for Rebecca Rettig

Mar 19, 2026

[6]
blockworks.com

Blockworks speaker biography for Rebecca Rettig

Mar 19, 2026

[7]
www.binance.com

Binance Square post on Rebecca Rettig's career

Mar 19, 2026

[8]
events.coindesk.com

CoinDesk Events speaker bio for Rebecca Rettig

Mar 19, 2026

[9]
www.crunchbase.com

Crunchbase profile for Rebecca Rettig

Mar 19, 2026

[10]
www.jito.wtf

Jito Labs announcement of Rettig as CLO

Mar 19, 2026

[11]
www.coindesk.com

CoinDesk report on Jito's policy strategy

Mar 19, 2026

[12]
www.salt.org

SALT conference speaker biography

Mar 19, 2026

[13]
www.youtube.com

Crypto Policy OG Rebecca Rettig on Navigating DC, Regulators, & Thriving as a Trusted Legal Advisor

Mar 19, 2026

[14]
www.youtube.com

A New Era For Crypto In The U.S | Rebecca Rettig

Mar 19, 2026

HomeCategoriesRankEventsGlossary